Skip to Content
Federal tax building at night.
Article

Bank tax planning in a time when changes are expected

March 5, 2025 / 5 min read

Sunsetting tax cuts pose significant challenges for financial institutions, but tax liabilities can be offset by purchasing energy credits, taking advantage of R&D tax credits, and benefiting from accelerated depreciation. Strategic tax planning is crucial to navigate these changes and optimize financial outcomes.

With tax changes likely on the horizon, the 2024 election has been monitored with considerable attention for the past few years. The driver of that attention was the fact that most provisions of the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (TCJA), enacted under the first Trump administration in 2017, are scheduled to expire on Dec. 31, 2025. Now that we have a slightly clearer picture after the recent election results, financial institutions will want to focus on potential tax-planning changes along with mixing in some old planning techniques to take advantage of lowering your effective tax rate and ultimately paying less money in taxes.

Sunsetting tax cuts: The potential business impact

The TCJA lowered the effective tax rate on certain pass-through business income through introduction of the qualified business income deduction (QBID) under Section 199A. When fully applied, this deduction-based regime works in conjunction with the lowered individual income tax brackets (top bracket of 37.0%) to impose a top 29.6% effective federal tax rate on qualified business income. Early drafts of the TCJA included a 25% tax on pass-through income, but QBID resulted from congressional negotiations. Currently, the existing version of QBID is scheduled to expire at the end of 2025. That expiration, in conjunction with the expiration of changes to individual tax brackets, would increase the top tax bracket on pass-through business income to 39.6%. While this won’t impact C corporation banks, it would have a significant impact on S corporation bank shareholders.

The TCJA was largely focused on providing tax cuts to businesses and individuals. However, concerns about the overall price tag of that bill required the introduction of revenue-raising tax rules. Importantly, three tax rules, commonly referred to as the trifecta, were enacted with deferred effective dates. Only two of these tax cuts generally impact financial institutions.

Corporate tax rate

Any discussion about corporate tax rates is necessarily different from other aspects of business taxation, given that it doesn’t involve expiring rules. One key feature of the TCJA was a significant tax rate cut for C corporations, resulting in the reduction of the top tax rate from 35% down to 21%. The first Trump administration initially requested a 15% corporate tax rate, but legislative negotiations resulted in the 21% rate in effect currently. That rate won’t expire at the end of 2025, so it’s not necessary for Congress to take any further action.

Tax-planning considerations

Inflation Reduction Act energy credits

The new Inflation Reduction Act (IRA) energy tax incentives and the related monetization options create a range of tax-planning and business opportunities for financial institutions. The primary benefit of the IRA tax credits is to direct a dollar-for-dollar offset against a business’s current year tax liability for the production of energy and clean resources for sale to unrelated parties. Financial institutions are generally not in the business of producing energy or clean resources, but a provision in the IRA allows businesses that qualify for these credits to sell them to unrelated parties for cash payment. As a result, financial institutions can purchase credits to offset tax liabilities at a negotiated discount. These credits can only be transferred once and, as a result when purchasing, you need to purchase them with the intention to offset tax, not resell. Looking ahead to 2025, the incoming Trump administration and Republican majorities in Congress are expected to revisit those incentives during debate over a new round of tax legislation.

R&D tax credits

To help potentially offset some of the Section 174 changes discussed earlier, financial institutions should consider analyzing any expenses that may qualify for a R&D tax credit. Many financial institutions invest significantly in software development and/or enhancement. This may include software to stay up to date with current trends and cybersecurity, development of online and mobile banking applications, or software targeted at automating various processes. Financial institutions often develop or customize software to increase productivity/security, develop new functionality, or make other changes in an attempt to improve company operations. If your institution has expenses that may qualify under these categories, consider their applicability to Section 174.

Accelerated depreciation

Accelerated depreciation in the form of Section 179 expense and bonus depreciation have been around for many years. Financial institutions have been able to take advantage of this benefit to lower their tax bill in the year an eligible asset is purchased. Remember, the bonus depreciation percentage will drop to 60% for 2024 (down from 100% in 2022 and 80% in 2023). If your institution has purchased eligible 179 property that’s less than $3,050,000, it can take full advantage of the $1,220,000 expense limitation. The phase-out occurs dollar for dollar over $3,050,000 up to $4,270,000.

Related Thinking

Nonprofit staff talking about the biggest risks their organizations are facing.
March 4, 2025

Common risks nonprofits are facing in 2025

Article 6 min read
View of the U.S. Capitol from a distance during evening hours
February 28, 2025

Tax policy perspectives: February 2025

Article 16 min read
Two tax professionals shaking handing on the steps of a government building.
February 27, 2025

Tax court further clarifies limited partner exception to self-employment taxes

Article 5 min read